These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16490089)

  • 1. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.
    Malviya S; Voepel-Lewis T; Burke C; Merkel S; Tait AR
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Mar; 16(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 16490089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.
    Voepel-Lewis T; Merkel S; Tait AR; Trzcinka A; Malviya S
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Nov; 95(5):1224-9, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12401598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of parent ratings as proxy measures of pain in children with cognitive impairment.
    Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S; Tait AR
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2005 Dec; 6(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 16337564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.
    Voepel-Lewis T; Zanotti J; Dammeyer JA; Merkel S
    Am J Crit Care; 2010 Jan; 19(1):55-61; quiz 62. PubMed ID: 20045849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.
    Nilsson S; Finnström B; Kokinsky E
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Aug; 18(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 18613934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.
    Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S; Tait AR; Merkel S; Foster R; Krane EJ; Davis PJ
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):72-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.
    Johansson M; Kokinsky E
    Nurs Crit Care; 2009; 14(3):122-30. PubMed ID: 19366409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings.
    Fox MA; Ayyangar R; Parten R; Haapala HJ; Schilling SG; Kalpakjian CZ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2019 Jan; 61(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 30051908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.
    Matsuishi Y; Hoshino H; Shimojo N; Enomoto Y; Kido T; Hoshino T; Sumitani M; Inoue Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194094. PubMed ID: 29534083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale.
    Manworren RC; Hynan LS
    Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 29(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 12723828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale in Assessing Acute Pain in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
    Kochman A; Howell J; Sheridan M; Kou M; Shelton Ryan EE; Lee S; Zettersten W; Yoder L
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 27977532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery.
    Bai J; Hsu L; Tang Y; van Dijk M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2012 Mar; 13(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 22341137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child's self-report.
    Willis MH; Merkel SI; Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S
    Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 29(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 12836995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children.
    Merkel SI; Voepel-Lewis T; Shayevitz JR; Malviya S
    Pediatr Nurs; 1997; 23(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 9220806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children.
    Babl FE; Crellin D; Cheng J; Sullivan TP; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1281-96. PubMed ID: 23187981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist--Postoperative Version.
    Johansson M; Carlberg EB; Jylli L
    Acta Paediatr; 2010 Jun; 99(6):929-33. PubMed ID: 20002626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of the Korean Version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale for Assessment of Pain in Dementia Patients.
    Moon Y; Kim YS; Lee J; Han SH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1852-1856. PubMed ID: 28960040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
    Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
    J Pain; 2018 Aug; 19(8):862-872. PubMed ID: 29551662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of two pain assessment tools in Brazilian children and adolescents.
    da Silva FC; Santos Thuler LC; de Leon-Casasola OA
    J Clin Nurs; 2011 Jul; 20(13-14):1842-8. PubMed ID: 21564357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of Pain and Distress Associated With Intranasal Midazolam Administration in Children and Evaluation of Validity of Four Observational Measures.
    Tsze DS; Ieni M; Flores-Sanchez PL; Shen ST; Bregstein JS; O'Connell NC; Dayan PS
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2021 Jan; 37(1):e17-e20. PubMed ID: 29794957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.