These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16490246)

  • 21. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic thermomechanical properties and sorption characteristics of two commercial light cured dental resin composites.
    Sideridou ID; Karabela MM; Vouvoudi ECh
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 17889316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Initial dynamic viscoelasticity change of composites during light curing.
    Kim MH; Min SH; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 20170947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fatigue behavior of packable composites.
    Abe Y; Braem MJ; Lambrechts P; Inoue S; Takeuchi M; Van Meerbeek B
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(17):3405-9. PubMed ID: 15621229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of the cross-linking silane concentration in a novel silane system on bonding resin-composite cement.
    Matinlinna J; Ozcan M; Lassila L; Kalk W; Vallittu P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 18622831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanical properties and bond strength of dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin.
    Aksornmuang J; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 16497370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Slumping resistance and viscoelasticity prior to setting of dental composites.
    Lee I; Chang J; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18433856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bis-(acrylamide)s as new cross-linkers for resin-based composite restoratives.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1157-62. PubMed ID: 16386292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method.
    Park JW; Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):882-9. PubMed ID: 16005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A material model for internal stress of dental composites caused by the curing process.
    Koplin C; Jaeger R; Hahn P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 18819703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of glass fiber layering on the flexural strength of microfill and hybrid composites.
    Eronat N; Candan U; Türkün M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):171-8; discussion 179-81. PubMed ID: 19508260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites.
    Beun S; Glorieux T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 16423384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of temperature on the visco-elastic properties of direct and indirect dental composite resins.
    Mesquita RV; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 17826827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.
    Placido E; Meira JB; Lima RG; Muench A; de Souza RM; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 17123595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam.
    Skilton JW; Tyas MJ; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A mathematical analysis of shrinkage stress development in dental composite restorations during resin polymerization.
    Li J; Li H; Fok SL
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 18191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis of two light-cured dental composites.
    Emami N; Söderholm KJ
    Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):977-83. PubMed ID: 16039704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate.
    Fong H; Dickens SH; Flaim GM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 15904694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.