131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16490521)
1. Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry.
Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 16490521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
Heeg GP; Blanksma LJ; Hardus PL; Jansonius NM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Mayoral F; Honrubia FM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies for improving the diagnostic specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter.
Heeg GP; Stoutenbeek R; Jansonius NM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15715557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.
Becker K; Semes L
Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of test duration as a screening criterion for frequency doubling perimetry.
Thomas R; Parikh R; Muliyil J; Bhat S; George R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):562-3. PubMed ID: 15013885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests.
Gardiner SK; Anderson DR; Fingeret M; McSoley JJ; Johnson CA
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):432-7. PubMed ID: 16840859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The results of screening frequency doubling technology perimetry in different locations of the community.
Mansberger SL; Johnson CA; Cioffi GA
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 17224754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of combined GDx-VCC and matrix FDT in a glaucoma screening trial.
Tóth M; Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 17700289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of community-based glaucoma screening using Frequency Doubling Technology and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography.
Robin TA; Müller A; Rait J; Keeffe JE; Taylor HR; Mukesh BN
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 12(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 16036475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Brush MB; Chen PP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):551-2. PubMed ID: 15013879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
