These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16491143)

  • 1. Evaluation of the smear layer removal effectiveness of EDTA using two techniques: an SEM study.
    Tinaz AC; Karadag LS; Alaçam T; Mihçioglu T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16491143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
    Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smear layer removal with different concentrations of EDTA-ethylenediamine mixtures.
    Aktener BO; Bilkay U
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 8360598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
    Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
    J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
    Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study.
    Garip Y; Sazak H; Gunday M; Hatipoglu S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e62-6. PubMed ID: 20573530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
    Lui JN; Kuah HG; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 17368342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
    Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures.
    Calt S; Serper A
    J Endod; 2002 Jan; 28(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11806642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of F file compared to ultrasonic techniques using scanning electron microscopy.
    Pradeepkumar M; Venkateshbabu N; Emmanuel S; Kandaswamy D
    N Y State Dent J; 2012; 78(5):54-7. PubMed ID: 23082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smear layer removal by EGTA.
    Calt S; Serper A
    J Endod; 2000 Aug; 26(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 11199779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer.
    Kuah HG; Lui JN; Tseng PS; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 19249602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal.
    Khedmat S; Shokouhinejad N
    J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 18436043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different irrigation on smear layer removal after post space preparation.
    Gu XH; Mao CY; Kern M
    J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 19345810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Perez F; Rouqueyrol-Pourcel N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 15716850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
    Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
    da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.