239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16491149)
1. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: a three-year clinical evaluation.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Stenberg R
ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 7560366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth.
Yilmaz Y; Gurbuz T; Kocogullari ME
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 15765965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth.
Attwood D; Reid JS; Evans D
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):183-5. PubMed ID: 8603144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement on primary molars: a comparative one-year study.
Prabhakar AR; Raju OS; Kurthukoti AJ; Satish V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18264535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.
Luo Y; Wei SH; Fan MW; Lo EC
Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):73-8. PubMed ID: 10863422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
