These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16491672)

  • 1. Stimulus-response compatibility and response preparation: effects on motor component of information processing for upper and lower limb responses.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 16491672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response preparation and stimulus-response congruence to fractionating reaction time of upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Kizuka T; Endo H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Aug; 99(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 15446625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 9885062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic and imperative motor activations in stimulus-response compatibility: magnetoencephalographic analysis of upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 16078021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of stimulus-response compatibility on cortical motor activation.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Zhu XH; Ugurbil K; Kim SG; Ashe J
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jan; 13(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11133304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?
    Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 15032988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abnormal externally guided movement preparation in recent-onset schizophrenia is associated with impaired selective attention to external input.
    Smid HG; Westenbroek JM; Bruggeman R; Knegtering H; Van den Bosch RJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Nov; 170(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19762086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.
    Obhi SS; Goodale MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 94(3):1861-8. PubMed ID: 15917318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1931-44. PubMed ID: 25850406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On-line executive control: an electromyographic study.
    Allain S; Carbonnell L; Burle B; Hasbroucq T; Vidal F
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 14693006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modifying the cortical processing for motor preparation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Terao Y; Furubayashi T; Okabe S; Mochizuki H; Arai N; Kobayashi S; Ugawa Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1556-73. PubMed ID: 17714016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affordance effects in grasping actions for graspable objects: electromyographic reaction time study.
    Suzuki T; Takagi M; Sugawara K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Dec; 115(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 23409599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
    Press C; Bird G; Walsh E; Heyes C
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-modulated neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of macaque monkeys.
    Lucchetti C; Bon L
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11713637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulus-set switching.
    Hsieh S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 16157405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and coding of tactile motor events: influence of distance between stimulated and responding body parts, spatial complexity of the task and sex of subject.
    Aglioti S; Tomaiuolo F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 11011866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm.
    Masaki H; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 10934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of precues in the preparation of motor responses in humans.
    Eversheim U; Bock O
    J Mot Behav; 2002 Sep; 34(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 19260177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.