These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16491677)

  • 1. Temporal production and visuospatial processing.
    Benuzzi F; Basso G; Nichelli P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):737-58. PubMed ID: 16491677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal interval production and processing in working memory.
    Fortin C; Breton R
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 7885819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time estimation and concurrent nontemporal processing: specific interference from short-term-memory demands.
    Fortin C; Rousseau R; Bourque P; Kirouac E
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):536-48. PubMed ID: 8332423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching.
    Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The "beam of darkness": spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects.
    Conci M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1725-38. PubMed ID: 19933558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):141-71. PubMed ID: 15907778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3269. PubMed ID: 18813345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J; McCarley JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal order in memory and interval timing: an interference analysis.
    Fortin C; Champagne J; Poirier M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Sep; 126(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17123455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
    Scharlau I
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capture of the gaze does not capture the mind.
    Lange EB; Starzynski C; Engbert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1168-82. PubMed ID: 22648605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.