355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16492153)
21. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiple-ligand-based virtual screening: methods and applications of the MTree approach.
Hessler G; Zimmermann M; Matter H; Evers A; Naumann T; Lengauer T; Rarey M
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6575-84. PubMed ID: 16220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of conformational flexibility on three-dimensional similarity searching using correlation vectors.
Renner S; Schwab CH; Gasteiger J; Schneider G
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2324-32. PubMed ID: 17125176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.
Hawkins PC; Skillman AG; Nicholls A
J Med Chem; 2007 Jan; 50(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 17201411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.
Halgren TA; Murphy RB; Friesner RA; Beard HS; Frye LL; Pollard WT; Banks JL
J Med Chem; 2004 Mar; 47(7):1750-9. PubMed ID: 15027866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of novel serotonin 2C receptor ligands by sequential virtual screening.
Ahmed A; Choo H; Cho YS; Park WK; Pae AN
Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jul; 17(13):4559-68. PubMed ID: 19464901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. GPCR structure-based virtual screening approach for CB2 antagonist search.
Chen JZ; Wang J; Xie XQ
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1626-37. PubMed ID: 17580929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.
Jain AN
J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):947-61. PubMed ID: 14761196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. QUASI: a novel method for simultaneous superposition of multiple flexible ligands and virtual screening using partial similarity.
Todorov NP; Alberts IL; de Esch IJ; Dean PM
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1007-20. PubMed ID: 17497844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. FLAP: GRID molecular interaction fields in virtual screening. validation using the DUD data set.
Cross S; Baroni M; Carosati E; Benedetti P; Clementi S
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1442-50. PubMed ID: 20690627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ensemble docking into multiple crystallographically derived protein structures: an evaluation based on the statistical analysis of enrichments.
Craig IR; Essex JW; Spiegel K
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):511-24. PubMed ID: 20222690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interpretation of scoring functions using 3D molecular fields. Mapping the diacyl-hydrazine-binding pocket of an insect ecdysone receptor.
Bordas B; Belai I; Lopata A; Szanto Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):176-85. PubMed ID: 17238263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex.
Miteva MA; Lee WH; Montes MO; Villoutreix BO
J Med Chem; 2005 Sep; 48(19):6012-22. PubMed ID: 16162004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens.
Perola E
Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 16708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes.
Cavasotto CN; Kovacs JA; Abagyan RA
J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jul; 127(26):9632-40. PubMed ID: 15984891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A flexible approach to induced fit docking.
Nabuurs SB; Wagener M; de Vlieg J
J Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 50(26):6507-18. PubMed ID: 18031000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
