200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16492173)
1. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions.
Patton DE; Olin SS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 16492173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary on "scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions".
Yosie TF
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 16492179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A perspective on scientific peer review for informing regulatory decisions: making sure peer review makes a difference.
Greenbaum D
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16492174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary on scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: roles and perspectives of scientists.
Omenn GS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 16492178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scholarly publishing. U.S. eases the squeeze on 'sanctioned' authors.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):187. PubMed ID: 15073341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. US officials urge biologists to vet publications for bioterror risk.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):197. PubMed ID: 12529597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legislating peer review in the Endangered Species Act.
Male T
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 16492177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A welcome retreat at Treasury.
Kennedy D
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):171. PubMed ID: 15073338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Problems and conflicts in peer review.
Kohn A; Putterman C
Int J Impot Res; 1993 Sep; 5(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 8124431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific peer-review processes in setting environmental quality standards in Japan.
Ikeda S; Uchiyama I
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 16492175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulatory policy. White House softens disputed peer-review plan.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5670):496-7. PubMed ID: 15105462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Leadership for psychiatrists.
Greiner CB
Acad Psychiatry; 2006; 30(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 16908604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why good leaders make bad decisions.
Campbell A; Whitehead J; Finkelstein S
Harv Bus Rev; 2009 Feb; 87(2):60-6, 109. PubMed ID: 19227556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trading scientific freedom.
Nat Med; 2004 Feb; 10(2):107. PubMed ID: 14760395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research impact assessment. Principles and applications to proposed, ongoing, and completed projects.
Kostoff RN
Invest Radiol; 1994 Sep; 29(9):864-9. PubMed ID: 7995709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disclosure and disinterest.
Kennedy D
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5654):15. PubMed ID: 14704397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
