200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16492173)
21. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
Saver RS
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. High-performing and low-performing nursing homes: a view from complexity science.
Forbes-Thompson S; Leiker T; Bleich MR
Health Care Manage Rev; 2007; 32(4):341-51. PubMed ID: 18075443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Presenting practice financial information.
Webster LA
J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 23(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 17974087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The history and contemporary challenges of the US Food and Drug Administration.
Borchers AT; Hagie F; Keen CL; Gershwin ME
Clin Ther; 2007 Jan; 29(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17379043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Editors and conflict of interest.
Baggs JG; Schmitt MH
Res Nurs Health; 2003 Apr; 26(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 12652605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: a European perspective.
Lofstedt R; Fairman R
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 16492176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [American judge preserves confidentiality in the peer review process].
Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jul; 152(28):1555-6. PubMed ID: 18712221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Science and regulation. A White House mandate for more peer review.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5638):1307. PubMed ID: 12958338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The failed conversion of CareFirst BlueCross Blueshield to for-profit status: part 1, the whole story.
McPherson B
Inquiry; 2004; 41(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 15669743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pure hype of pure research helps no one.
Sarewitz D
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):411. PubMed ID: 23698406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.
Grainger DW
Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementing an effective organization and governance structure for a radiology practice.
Muroff LR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 17411516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Administrative "health courts" for medical injury claims: the federal constitutional issues.
Elliott ED; Narayan SA; Nasmith MS
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Aug; 33(4):761-98. PubMed ID: 18617674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Maintaining the strength of your convictions.
Tyler JL
Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 May; 58(5):98-100. PubMed ID: 15162762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluate this.
Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):1-2. PubMed ID: 16511449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective.
Sellke FW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1683-5. PubMed ID: 14688671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
