146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16492177)
1. Legislating peer review in the Endangered Species Act.
Male T
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 16492177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A perspective on scientific peer review for informing regulatory decisions: making sure peer review makes a difference.
Greenbaum D
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16492174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary on scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: roles and perspectives of scientists.
Omenn GS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 16492178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary on "scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions".
Yosie TF
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 16492179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions.
Patton DE; Olin SS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 16492173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific peer-review processes in setting environmental quality standards in Japan.
Ikeda S; Uchiyama I
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 16492175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulatory policy. White House softens disputed peer-review plan.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5670):496-7. PubMed ID: 15105462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National Environmental Policy Act at 35.
Bronstein DA; Baer D; Bryan H; DiMento JF; Narayan S
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5710):674. PubMed ID: 15692033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conservation policy. House revises Endangered Species Act.
Stokstad E
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):32. PubMed ID: 16210505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The acquisition and utilization of technical information by administrative agencies.
Sabatier P
Adm Sci Q; 1978 Sep; 23(3):396-417. PubMed ID: 10297211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A welcome retreat at Treasury.
Kennedy D
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):171. PubMed ID: 15073338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Trading scientific freedom.
Nat Med; 2004 Feb; 10(2):107. PubMed ID: 14760395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: a European perspective.
Lofstedt R; Fairman R
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 16492176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scholarly publishing. U.S. eases the squeeze on 'sanctioned' authors.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):187. PubMed ID: 15073341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A public policymaker's response: Weisleder and Meyer on legislator decision-making.
Sullivan KB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 18354117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US pressures publishers to honor trade embargoes.
Wickware P
Nat Med; 2004 Feb; 10(2):109. PubMed ID: 14760397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The relevance of international studies to informed pharmacoeconomics and health policy decisions.
Lyles A
Clin Ther; 2010 Jan; 32(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 20171416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Science policy. New regulatory czar takes charge.
Kaiser J
Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5540):32-3. PubMed ID: 11588229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Endangered Species Act. Cherished concepts faltering in the field.
Shouse B
Science; 2002 May; 296(5571):1219-21. PubMed ID: 12016283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unmatured science and government regulation.
Burger EJ
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1976 Nov; 2(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 1011295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
