These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Pure hype of pure research helps no one. Sarewitz D Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):411. PubMed ID: 23698406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Action research in public schools: is it research? Should it be reviewed? Sigler E J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Jun; 4(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 19480588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Importance of peer-reviewed science in the debates on public policy. Scanes CG Poult Sci; 2009 Jan; 88(1):1. PubMed ID: 19096049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. U.S. science policy. Report tells NSF to think more boldly. Mervis J Science; 2007 Mar; 315(5817):1352-3. PubMed ID: 17347421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Who owns the data? Blei AT Hepatology; 2004 Dec; 40(6):1237. PubMed ID: 15558736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. U.S. science policy. Peer review not popular at Homeland Security. Bhattacharjee Y Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5954):779. PubMed ID: 19892948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Phillips MK Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 17002756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Academic earmarks. Senators take aim at Texas project. Malakoff D Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5599):1697-8. PubMed ID: 12459560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The endangered species act: science, policy, and politics. Bean MJ Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():369-91. PubMed ID: 19432657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]