These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16492589)

  • 41. Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system.
    Battista L; Chung JH; Lagrew DC; Wing DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):241.e1-7; discussion 322-3, e1-4. PubMed ID: 17826404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Aslan H; Unlu E; Agar M; Ceylan Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Mar; 113(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15036710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
    Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Randomized comparative study of induced labor with oxytocin and misoprostol in prolonged pregnancies].
    Echeverría E; Rocha M
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1995; 60(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 8559985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone.
    Balci O; Mahmoud AS; Ozdemir S; Acar A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 110(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 20347088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term.
    da Graça Krupa F; Cecatti JG; de Castro Surita FG; Milanez HM; Parpinelli MA
    BJOG; 2005 Sep; 112(9):1284-90. PubMed ID: 16101609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Labor induction in preeclampsia: is misoprostol more effective than dinoprostone?
    Lapaire O; Zanetti-Dällenbach R; Weber P; Hösli I; Holzgreve W; Surbek D
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17378719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes.
    Larrañaga-Azcárate C; Campo-Molina G; Pérez-Rodríguez AF; Ezcurdia-Gurpegui M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18231888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Vaginal misoprostol induction of labour: a Nigerian hospital experience.
    Ezechi OC; Kalu BK; Njokanma FO; Nwokoro CA; Okeke GC
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 15203615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Induction of labor in toxemia with misoprostol.
    Sahin HG; Sahin HA; Kocer M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Mar; 81(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 11966483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
    Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Induction of labor with oxytocin increases cesarean section rate as compared with oxytocin for augmentation of spontaneous labor in nulliparous parturients controlled for lumbar epidural analgesia.
    Kaul B; Vallejo MC; Ramanathan S; Mandell G; Phelps AL; Daftary AR
    J Clin Anesth; 2004 Sep; 16(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 15567643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Delivery outcomes in women undergoing elective labor induction at term.
    Tam T; Conte M; Schuler H; Malang S; Roque M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Mar; 287(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 23053315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
    Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol.
    Chandra S; Allen V; Lee W; Fanning C; Young D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 16009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of induced labour on postpartum blood loss.
    Phillip H; Fletcher H; Reid M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jan; 24(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 14675973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.