These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16492589)

  • 61. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
    Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Benefit of misoprostol for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial].
    Fekih M; Jnifene A; Fathallah K; Ben Regaya L; Memmi A; Bouguizene S; Chaieb A; Bibi M; Khairi H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Nov; 38(7):588-93. PubMed ID: 19833454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25 microg and 50 microg vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients.
    Szczesny W; Sandvik L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Mar; 22(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 19330712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Influence of misoprostol (PGE1) on amniotic fluid and maternal serum adrenomedullin levels.
    Hascalik S; Celik O; Dogru MI; Kocagun Dogru A; Inan E; Yurekli M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):833-6. PubMed ID: 16097971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The routine use of oxytocin after oral misoprostol for labour induction in women with an unfavourable cervix is not of benefit.
    De A; Bagga R; Gopalan S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 16866794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Misoprostol and induction of labour].
    Porozhanova V; Sampat D; Porozhanova K
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 16313050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Misoprostol in labour induction of term pregnancy: a meta-analysis.
    Li XM; Wan J; Xu CF; Zhang Y; Fang L; Shi ZJ; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2004 Mar; 117(3):449-52. PubMed ID: 15043790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
    Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
    Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.
    Nuthalapaty FS; Rouse DJ; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 14990405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Predictors of cesarean section following elective post-dates induction of labor in nullipara with uncomplicated singleton vertex pregnancies.
    Edris FE; von Dadelszen P; Ainsworth LM; Liston RM
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1167-72. PubMed ID: 16883446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
    Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A study of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in toxemia of pregnancy.
    Sahin HG; Sahin HA; Surucu R; Guvercinci M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Oct; 75(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 11597613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Shorter delivery time after induction with misoprostol].
    Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Brühwiler H; Lüscher KP
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2001; 205(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 11570195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women.
    Zamzami TY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 16160873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Utility of misoprostol for labor induction in severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.
    Nahar S; Rasul CH; Sayed A; Azim AK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 15327446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.