These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16493796)

  • 1. The minor's limited right to confidential health care and the inverse of confidentiality: a parent's decision not to disclose illness status to a minor child.
    van Straaten J
    Child Leg Rights J; 2000; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16493796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception.
    Arons JR
    William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
    Graziano SG
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF; Martinez S
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
    Blasdell J
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey.
    Siliciano JA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AIDS and adolescents.
    Hartman RG
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 15573442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof.
    Webster RD; Neustadt AN; Whitaker AK; Gilliam ML
    Contraception; 2010 Oct; 82(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 20851223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A minor's right to abortion -- the unconstitutionality of parental participation in bypass hearings.
    Ehrlich JS; Sabino JA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1991; 25(4):1185-209. PubMed ID: 11659404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic testing of children for adult-onset diseases: is testing in the child's best interests?
    Pelias MK
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 May; 73(3):605-8. PubMed ID: 16758098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 307():783-94. PubMed ID: 16477720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Family law I: abortion.
    Koscs ME
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.