These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16494610)

  • 1. Perception of very small visual stimuli in the fovea: normative data for the Rarebit Foveal Test.
    Nilsson M; Wanger P; Martin L
    Clin Exp Optom; 2006 Mar; 89(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 16494610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fixation stability during Rarebit Fovea Test.
    Nilsson MM; Stevenson SB; Kumar G; Martin L; Brautaset RL
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18637108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rarebit fovea test in children: reference data for children aged six to 10 years.
    Nilsson M; Svanberg M; Schalin S; Brautaset RL
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22023152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microdot test of foveal function. A comparison with visual acuity at high and low contrast.
    Malmer L; Martin L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 15713199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rarebit perimetry and fovea test before and after cataract surgery.
    Nilsson M; Abdiu O; Laurell CG; Martin L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 88(4):479-82. PubMed ID: 19432846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test-retest variability.
    Chin CF; Yip LW; Sim DC; Yeo AC
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 39(8):752-9. PubMed ID: 22050562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of crowding and interocular interactions in a resolution acuity task.
    Masgoret X; Asper L; Alexander J; Suttle C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9452-6. PubMed ID: 22058333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular summation in the fovea and peripheral field of anisometropic amblyopes.
    Pardhan S; Whitaker A
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Jan; 20(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 10611713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foveal function in children treated for amblyopia.
    Agervi P; Nilsson M; Martin L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 88(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 19183413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of stimulus size on binocular summation within the binocular visual field].
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Iwagaki A; Matsumoto F; Ohmure K; Shimomura Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Feb; 105(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 11235199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-pulse temporal integration functions in the fovea and peripheral retina.
    Gottlieb MD; Kietzman ML
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Apr; 64(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 3588181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capturing age-related changes in functional contrast sensitivity with decreasing light levels in monocular and binocular vision.
    Gillespie-Gallery H; Konstantakopoulou E; Harlow JA; Barbur JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 54(9):6093-103. PubMed ID: 23920364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contour interaction for foveal acuity targets at different luminances.
    Bedell HE; Siderov J; Waugh SJ; Zemanová R; Pluháček F; Musilová L
    Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():90-5. PubMed ID: 23880125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jan; 53(1):387-93. PubMed ID: 22167098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field.
    Wood JM; Collins MJ; Carkeet A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jan; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 1584616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular summation on fused annular backgrounds.
    Cogan AI; Silverman G; Chan H
    Perception; 1984; 13(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 6504679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral visual response time and retinal luminance-area relations.
    Haines RF
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1975 Feb; 52(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 1130478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Near Mallett Unit Foveal Suppression Test: a cross-sectional study to establish test norms and relationship with other optometric tests.
    Tang ST; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 17239188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.