These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16494918)

  • 21. Temporal ventriloquism: sound modulates the flash-lag effect.
    Vroomen J; de Gelder B; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 15161383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring attention using flash-lag effect.
    Shioiri S; Yamamoto K; Oshida H; Matsubara K; Yaguchi H
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):10. PubMed ID: 20884475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The perceived position of a moving object is not the result of position integration.
    Shen M; Zhou J; Gao T; Liang J; Shui R
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3088-95. PubMed ID: 17905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precuing an isolated stimulus temporarily outweighs in-stream stimulus facilitation.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T; Oja A
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Apr; 135(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 18507316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mental extrapolation of motion modulates responsiveness to visual stimuli.
    de'Sperati C; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2593-601. PubMed ID: 16545854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 21208608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The flash-lag effect is reduced when the flash is perceived as a sensory consequence of our action.
    López-Moliner J; Linares D
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2122-9. PubMed ID: 16405940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceived timing of new objects and feature changes.
    Kanai R; Carlson TA; Verstraten FA; Walsh V
    J Vis; 2009 Jul; 9(7):5. PubMed ID: 19761320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cyclopean flash-lag illusion.
    Nieman D; Nijhawan R; Khurana B; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3909-14. PubMed ID: 16854446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Object motion continuity and the flash-lag effect.
    Au RK; Watanabe K
    Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():19-25. PubMed ID: 23994485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 18303587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization.
    Kanai R; Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(22):2605-19. PubMed ID: 15358076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flash-lag chimeras: the role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect.
    Khurana B; Carter RM; Watanabe K; Nijhawan R
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2757-72. PubMed ID: 16545419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load.
    Matsukura M; Brockmole JR; Boot WR; Henderson JM
    Vision Res; 2011 Mar; 51(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 21310171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dividing attention in the flash-lag illusion.
    Sarich D; Chappell M; Burgess C
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17173948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli.
    Baldo MV; Kihara AH; Namba J; Klein SA
    Perception; 2002; 31(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of contrast on the active control of a moving line.
    Li L; Sweet BT; Stone LS
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 93(5):2873-86. PubMed ID: 15615838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.