332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16495145)
1. Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Sommer M; Alfaro A; Rummel M; Speck S; Lang N; Tings T; Paulus W
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):838-44. PubMed ID: 16495145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative assessment of best conventional with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human motor cortex excitability.
Zafar N; Paulus W; Sommer M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1393-9. PubMed ID: 18400556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.
Hamada M; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Yugeta A; Matsumoto H; Shirota Y; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2672-82. PubMed ID: 17977788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TMS of primary motor cortex with a biphasic pulse activates two independent sets of excitable neurones.
Sommer M; Ciocca M; Chieffo R; Hammond P; Neef A; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Hannah R
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 29352669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stimulus waveform influences the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Taylor JL; Loo CK
J Affect Disord; 2007 Jan; 97(1-3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16887197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysteresis effects on the input-output curve of motor evoked potentials.
Möller C; Arai N; Lücke J; Ziemann U
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):1003-8. PubMed ID: 19329358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of pulse shape in motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation using full-sine stimuli.
Delvendahl I; Gattinger N; Berger T; Gleich B; Siebner HR; Mall V
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115247. PubMed ID: 25514673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth.
Roth Y; Pell GS; Zangen A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):255-8; author reply 258-9. PubMed ID: 19815456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Mochizuki H; Iwata NK; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2227-33. PubMed ID: 17765606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.
Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Paulus W; Lang N
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1915-21. PubMed ID: 20444645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two different effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the human motor cortex during the pre-movement period.
Hashimoto T; Inaba D; Matsumura M; Naito E
Neurosci Res; 2004 Dec; 50(4):427-36. PubMed ID: 15567480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of a high-frequency, low-intensity, biphasic conditioning train of TMS pulses on the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Okabe S; Kobayashi-Iwata N; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Ugawa Y
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Oct; 462(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 19559074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing cortical silent period: optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction.
Säisänen L; Pirinen E; Teitti S; Könönen M; Julkunen P; Määttä S; Karhu J
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 18243329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Opposite optimal current flow directions for induction of neuroplasticity and excitation threshold in the human motor cortex.
Sommer M; Norden C; Schmack L; Rothkegel H; Lang N; Paulus W
Brain Stimul; 2013 May; 6(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 22885142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcranial magnetic stimulation with a half-sine wave pulse elicits direction-specific effects in human motor cortex.
Jung NH; Delvendahl I; Pechmann A; Gleich B; Gattinger N; Siebner HR; Mall V
BMC Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 13():139. PubMed ID: 23126287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The nature and time course of cortical activation following subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
Kuriakose R; Saha U; Castillo G; Udupa K; Ni Z; Gunraj C; Mazzella F; Hamani C; Lang AE; Moro E; Lozano AM; Hodaie M; Chen R
Cereb Cortex; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1926-36. PubMed ID: 20019146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of waveform and current direction on short-interval intracortical facilitation: a paired-pulse TMS study.
Delvendahl I; Lindemann H; Jung NH; Pechmann A; Siebner HR; Mall V
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 24075915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repetitive paired-pulse TMS at I-wave periodicity markedly increases corticospinal excitability: a new technique for modulating synaptic plasticity.
Thickbroom GW; Byrnes ML; Edwards DJ; Mastaglia FL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16326137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Davila-Pérez P; Jannati A; Fried PJ; Cudeiro Mazaira J; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroscience; 2018 Nov; 393():97-109. PubMed ID: 30300705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
