These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements. Braun S; Bantleon HP; Hnat WP; Freudenthaler JW; Marcotte MR; Johnson BE Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8526297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms. Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls. Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Yoon YJ; Kim DH; Yu PS; Kim HJ; Choi EH; Kim KW Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11843271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in monozygotic twins with their siblings. Sorin MS; Ramsey TC; Hart TC; Farrington FH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1991; 15(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 1878327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of chewing rhythm, craniomandibular morphology, body mass and height between mothers and their biological daughters. Cho C; Louie K; Maawadh A; Gerstner GE Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(11):1667-74. PubMed ID: 26363460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalometric characteristics of open bite in adults: a three-dimensional cephalometric evaluation. Haralabakis NB; Yiagtzis SC; Toutountzakis NM Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 7814927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experiments with unilateral bite planes in rabbits. Sergl HG; Farmland M Angle Orthod; 1975 Apr; 45(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1054937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study on a method to identify the border between mandibular corpus and ramus on lateral cephalometric radiograph. Lin YF; Ono Y; Ono H Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1992 Mar; 39(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1581998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A longitudinal study of 5 cephalometric plane angles in female children from 7 to 12 years old]. Peng J; Deng H; Cao C Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 20(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 12600065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A lateral cephalometric x-ray study of selected vertical dimensions in children with atypical deglutition. Machado AJ; Crespo AN Int J Orofacial Myology; 2010 Nov; 36():17-26. PubMed ID: 23362599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A comparative study of skeletal cephalometric of normal occlusion between the middle-old-aged and young people]. Zhang C; Lai S; Hu G Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Aug; 15(3):226-7, 241. PubMed ID: 11480004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TMJ internal derangement and adolescent craniofacial morphology: a pilot study. Nebbe B; Major PW; Prasad NG; Grace M; Kamelchuk LS Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 9428958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]