These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16496718)

  • 1. Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.
    Patching GR; Jordan TR
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):961-71. PubMed ID: 16496718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability.
    Patching GR; Jordan TR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2219-24. PubMed ID: 15914644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using spatial frequency adaptation to study word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Sherman SM; Patching GR
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 Nov; 39(4):884-91. PubMed ID: 18183905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the control of visual word recognition: changing routes versus changing deadlines.
    Raman I; Baluch B; Besner D
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 15285131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: effects of word length and word frequency.
    Hyönä J; Olson RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Nov; 21(6):1430-40. PubMed ID: 7490575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Jordan TR; Dixon J; McGowan VA; Kurtev S; Paterson KB
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1433. PubMed ID: 27733837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.
    Bowey JA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jul; 100(3):186-214. PubMed ID: 18054365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading-related wavelength and spatial frequency effects in visual spatial location.
    Solman RT; Dain SJ; Lim HS; May JG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Mar; 15(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 7659408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imbalanced word-reading profiles in eighth-graders.
    Bowey JA; Rutherford J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Mar; 96(3):169-96. PubMed ID: 17266981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers.
    Fiset D; Gosselin F; Blais C; Arguin M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1466-76. PubMed ID: 16989548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.
    Ashby J; Rayner K; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1065-86. PubMed ID: 16194948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of feedback and differences between good and poor decoders in a repeated word reading paradigm in first grade.
    van Gorp K; Segers E; Verhoeven L
    Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Apr; 67(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 27068186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers: differential effects of visual crowding in foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision.
    Moll K; Jones M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2085-91. PubMed ID: 24161215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word length, phonemic, and visual similarity effects in poor and normal readers.
    McNeil AM; Johnston RS
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 15552346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast and slow readers and the effectiveness of the spatial frequency content of text: Evidence from reading times and eye movements.
    Jordan TR; Dixon J; McGowan VA; Kurtev S; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1066-71. PubMed ID: 27123680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specific reading disability: differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency.
    Lovegrove WJ; Bowling A; Badcock D; Blackwood M
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4468):439-40. PubMed ID: 7433985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface and phonological developmental dyslexia in Greek.
    Douklias SD; Masterson J; Hanley JR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Dec; 26(8):705-23. PubMed ID: 20407965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separating the influences of prereading skills on early word and nonword reading.
    Shapiro LR; Carroll JM; Solity JE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):278-95. PubMed ID: 23892335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Default spacing is the optimal spacing for word reading.
    van den Boer M; Hakvoort BE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):697-709. PubMed ID: 25210997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.