BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

5077 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16497283)

  • 1. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern.
    Sculthorpe LD; Collin CA; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():78-86. PubMed ID: 18674520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task.
    Gomes H; Molholm S; Ritter W; Kurtzberg D; Cowan N; Vaughan HG
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 11117461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS; Möttönen R; Sams M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
    Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Myers R; Pirillo R; Drysdale K
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
    Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.
    Shalgi S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1878-88. PubMed ID: 17239410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention.
    Rinne T; Särkkä A; Degerman A; Schröger E; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 16487946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: a mismatch negativity study.
    Micheyl C; Carlyon RP; Shtyrov Y; Hauk O; Dodson T; Pullvermüller F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):747-58. PubMed ID: 12965047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mismatch negativity (MMN) with no standard stimulus.
    Pakarinen S; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 121(7):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20207581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes.
    Schröger E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 254.