These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16498037)

  • 1. Trends in image quality in high magnification digital specimen cabinet radiography.
    Birch IP; Kotre CJ; Padgett R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):239-43. PubMed ID: 16498037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase-contrast and magnification radiography at diagnostic X-ray energies using a pseudo-microfocus X-ray source.
    Kotre CJ; Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20130734. PubMed ID: 24779409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neonatal magnification radiography using standard-focus x-ray tubes.
    Nikesch W; Kuntzler CM; Cushing FR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Oct; 141(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 6604414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of the phase-contrast radiography edge-enhancement effect in a cabinet x-ray system.
    Donnelly EF; Lewis KG; Wolske KM; Pickens DR; Price RR
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16357428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Direct radiographic magnification mammography with a new microfocus tube. Experimental studies of resolution and radiation exposure].
    Post K; Hermann KP; Funke M; Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):604-9. PubMed ID: 9411476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness.
    Doi K; Genant HK; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 1244657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The system concept of a microfocus x-ray system for clinical application].
    Gebureck P; Fredow G; Sperner W
    Radiologe; 1991 Sep; 31(9):407-12. PubMed ID: 1947058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):441-6. PubMed ID: 8319066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
    Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct magnification radiography of the newborn infant.
    Brasch RC; Gould RG
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 7063679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct radiographic magnification with computed radiography.
    Nakano Y; Hiraoka T; Togashi K; Nishimura K; Itoh K; Fujisawa I; Sagoh T; Minami S; Itoh H; Torizuka K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Mar; 148(3):569-73. PubMed ID: 3492887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose efficiency and the effects of resolution and noise on detail perceptibility in radiographic magnification.
    Wagner LK; Cohen G; Wong WH; Amtey SR
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 7207424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of radiographic magnification on image contrast of blood vessels.
    Sandor T; Nott P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Jan; 134(1):159-92. PubMed ID: 6766009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.