179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16498097)
41. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography.
Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results.
Trilisky I; Wroblewski K; Vannier MW; Horne JM; Dachman AH
Radiographics; 2014; 34(7):1885-905. PubMed ID: 25384290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colonic polyps.
Yoshida H; Näppi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1261-74. PubMed ID: 11811826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonographic images.
Jensch S; van Gelder RE; Florie J; Thomassen-de Graaf MA; Lobé JV; Bossuyt PM; Bipat S; Nio CY; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):W249-55. PubMed ID: 17312031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection: Effect on radiologist observers of polyp identification by CAD on both the supine and prone scans.
Summers RM; Liu J; Rehani B; Stafford P; Brown L; Louie A; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash B; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):948-59. PubMed ID: 20542452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Will 3D virtual dissection display prove to be the display format for reviewing CT colonography examinations?
Glick S
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 17709819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study.
Summers RM; Beaulieu CF; Pusanik LM; Malley JD; Jeffrey RB; Glazer DI; Napel S
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 10887263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system.
Graser A; Kolligs FT; Mang T; Schaefer C; Geisbüsch S; Reiser MF; Becker CR
Eur Radiol; 2007 Oct; 17(10):2608-15. PubMed ID: 17429646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Computer assisted detection software for CT colonography: effect of sphericity filter on performance characteristics for patients with and without fecal tagging.
Dehmeshki J; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Roddie ME; McQuillan J; Honeyfield L; Amin H
Eur Radiol; 2007 Mar; 17(3):662-8. PubMed ID: 17021701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer.
Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The use of 3D surface fitting for robust polyp detection and classification in CT colonography.
Chowdhury TA; Whelan PF; Ghita O
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Dec; 30(8):427-36. PubMed ID: 16919911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population.
Summers RM; Johnson CD; Pusanik LM; Malley JD; Youssef AM; Reed JE
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11274534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
