179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16498097)
61. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
Zalis ME; Perumpillichira JJ; Kim JY; Del Frate C; Magee C; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 15987967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study.
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 17185666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. CT colonography: accuracy of initial interpretation by radiographers in routine clinical practice.
Burling D; Wylie P; Gupta A; Illangovan R; Muckian J; Ahmad R; Marshall M; Taylor SA
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20103434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Application of CT colonography in diagnosis of colonic polyps].
Pan WD; Qin MW; Xue HD; Liu XH; Qian JM; Yang AM
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2006 Feb; 28(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 16548198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Edge displacement field-based classification for improved detection of polyps in CT colonography.
Acar B; Beaulieu CF; Göktürk SB; Tomasi C; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Napel S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 12588030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Lines of curvature for polyp detection in virtual colonoscopy.
Zhao L; Botha CP; Bescos JO; Truyen R; Vos FM; Post FH
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(5):885-92. PubMed ID: 17080813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance.
Burling D; Moore A; Marshall M; Weldon J; Gillen C; Baldwin R; Smith K; Pickhardt PJ; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 18374719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Automated measurement of colorectal polyp height at CT colonography: hyperplastic polyps are flatter than adenomatous polyps.
Summers RM; Liu J; Yao J; Brown L; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1305-10. PubMed ID: 19843746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Transparent rendering of intraluminal contrast for 3D polyp visualization at CT colonography.
Shi R; Napel S; Rosenberg JK; Shin LK; Walsh CF; Mogensen MA; Joshi AJ; Pankhudi P; Beaulieu CF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 17895791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Distributed human intelligence for colonic polyp classification in computer-aided detection for CT colonography.
Nguyen TB; Wang S; Anugu V; Rose N; McKenna M; Petrick N; Burns JE; Summers RM
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):824-33. PubMed ID: 22274839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The effect of reconstruction algorithm on conspicuity of polyps in CT colonography.
Dachman AH; Schumm P; Heckel B; Yoshida H; LaRiviere P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1349-53. PubMed ID: 15505302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers.
Dachman AH; Kelly KB; Zintsmaster MP; Rana R; Khankari S; Novak JD; Ali AN; Qalbani A; Fletcher JG
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18796675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.
Halligan S; Mallett S; Altman DG; McQuillan J; Proud M; Beddoe G; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 21084409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Support vector machines committee classification method for computer-aided polyp detection in CT colonography.
Jerebko AK; Malley JD; Franaszek M; Summers RM
Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 15831422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm.
Mani A; Napel S; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Olcott EW; Prokesch R; Davila M; Schraedley-Desmond P; Beaulieu CF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 15100534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate?
Punwani S; Halligan S; Irving P; Bloom S; Bungay A; Greenhalgh R; Godbold J; Taylor SA; Altman DG
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):874-81. PubMed ID: 18176807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Assessment of two different software solutions for the evaluation of CT colonography].
Andersen K; Blondin D; Beck A; Aurich V; Vogt C; Mödder U; Cohnen M
Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1227-34. PubMed ID: 16123868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
