These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16499237)

  • 1. A comparison of the outcomes of partnership caseload midwifery and standard hospital care in low risk mothers.
    Johnson M; Stewart H; Langdon R; Kelly P; Yong L
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2005; 22(3):21-7. PubMed ID: 16499237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part I: clinical effectiveness.
    Turnbull D; Baghurst P; Collins C; Cornwell C; Nixon A; Donnelan-Fernandez R; Antoniou G
    Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 19101219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women-centred care and caseload models of midwifery.
    Johnson M; Stewart H; Langdon R; Kelly P; Yong L
    Collegian; 2003 Jan; 10(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 15481509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate neonatal outcomes after elective induction of labor.
    Beebe L; Beaty C; Rayburn W
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 17465284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Laros RK; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):585.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17547906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of delivery suite guidelines on intrapartum care in 'standard primigravida'.
    Alfirevic Z; Edwards G; Platt MJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Jul; 115(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 15223161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
    McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Biro MA; Albers L; Flood M; Oats J; Waldenström U
    BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: women's satisfaction.
    Fereday J; Collins C; Turnbull D; Pincombe J; Oster C
    Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18926788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of obstetric intensive care unit admissions in New Jersey.
    Madan I; Puri I; Jain NJ; Grotegut C; Nelson D; Dandolu V
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Sep; 22(9):785-90. PubMed ID: 19488949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with non-normal birth outcomes for low-risk women in an inner-city hospital.
    McDermott AM
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20189128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of record linkage to examine alcohol use in pregnancy.
    Burns L; Mattick RP; Cooke M
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2006 Apr; 30(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 16573582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
    Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
    Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised study of midwifery caseload care and traditional 'shared-care'.
    North Staffordshire Changing Childbirth Research Team
    Midwifery; 2000 Dec; 16(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 11080465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial.
    Tracy SK; Hartz DL; Tracy MB; Allen J; Forti A; Hall B; White J; Lainchbury A; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Bisits A; Homer C; Foureur M; Welsh A; Kildea S
    Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9906):1723-32. PubMed ID: 24050808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Child births in a modified midwife managed unit: selection and transfer according to intended place of delivery.
    Holt J; Vold IN; Backe B; Johansen MV; Oian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Mar; 80(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 11207485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a pilot study of outcomes in women receiving midwifery care.
    Avery MD; Carr CA; Burkhardt P
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 15010663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
    Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.
    Jepsen I; Juul S; Foureur MJ; Sørensen EE; Nohr EA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):481. PubMed ID: 30522453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women with intellectual disability at risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes.
    McConnell D; Mayes R; Llewellyn G
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Jun; 52(Pt 6):529-35. PubMed ID: 18422528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.