These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Nonmedical use of ultrasound: bioeffects and safety risk. Abramowicz JS Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1213-20. PubMed ID: 20691913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. WFUMB Symposium on Safety of Nonmedical Use of Ultrasound. Barnett SB; Abramowicz JS; Ziskin MC; Marsál K; Claudon M Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1209-12. PubMed ID: 20691912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonmedical use of ultrasound in pregnancy: ethical issues, patients' rights and potential misuse. Brezinka C Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1233-6. PubMed ID: 20598435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and U.S. Regulatory considerations in the nonclinical use of medical ultrasound devices. Phillips RA; Stratmeyer ME; Harris GR Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1224-8. PubMed ID: 20447750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects on maternal anxiety of two-dimensional versus two- plus three-/four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancies at risk of fetal abnormalities: A randomized study. Leung KY; Ngai CS; Lee A; Chan HY; Leung WC; Lee CP; Tang MH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 16909403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Achieving medical device safety in an era of globalization. Meritz JK; White TL Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 19031664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why (not) do obstetric ultrasound? An observation on uncertainty. Reed KL Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 8843608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006. Siddique J; Lauderdale DS; VanderWeele TJ; Lantos JD Med Care; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19786915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pin the tail on the other donkey: allocating and avoiding injury losses after drug or device approval. O'Reilly JT Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):559-72. PubMed ID: 17915397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound: more harm than good? Wagner M Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (50):28-30. PubMed ID: 10478047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The First Amendment and FDA restrictions on off-label uses: the call for a new approach. Leghorn J; Brophy E; Rother P Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(2):391-406. PubMed ID: 18561466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Canadian perspective: trends in drug and medical device class actions in Canada. Vernon W Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(3):569-76. PubMed ID: 16989040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Questions about prenatal ultrasound and the alarming increase in autism. Rodgers C Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2006; (80):16-9, 66-7. PubMed ID: 17265825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Food and Drug Administration's regulation of risk disclosure for implantable cardioverter defibrillators: has technology outpaced the Agency's regulatory framework? Basile EM; Lorell BH Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(2):251-72. PubMed ID: 16903031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Off-label does not mean off-base. Kaufman JA J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):970-1. PubMed ID: 18589309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical devices post-approval studies program: vision, strategies, challenges and opportunities. Marinac-Dabic D; Bonhomme M; Loyo-Berrios N; Gross T; Ciperson R; Gardner S; Marcarelli M Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 17915402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Complying with US nonconforming product requirements. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2007; 18(3):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 17585716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]