267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16499886)
1. Error-processing of oculomotor capture.
Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 16499886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of awareness in processing of oculomotor capture: evidence from event-related potentials.
Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2285-97. PubMed ID: 18457508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture.
Wu SC; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1050-67. PubMed ID: 14585022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types.
Maier M; Steinhauser M; Hübner R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 18457501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
Tanaka H
Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of attentional and oculomotor control.
Kramer AF; de Sather JC; Cassavaugh ND
Dev Psychol; 2005 Sep; 41(5):760-72. PubMed ID: 16173873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task.
Van der Stigchel S; Heslenfeld DJ; Theeuwes J
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 16595127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overactive performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder: ERP evidence from correct and erroneous reactions.
Endrass T; Klawohn J; Schuster F; Kathmann N
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1877-87. PubMed ID: 18514679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
Sawaki R; Katayama J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unavoidable errors: a spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task.
Vocat R; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 18533202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study.
Veldhuijzen DS; Kenemans JL; van Wijck AJ; Olivier B; Kalkman CJ; Volkerts ER
Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 16480825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
Xu X; Liu C
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load.
Matsukura M; Brockmole JR; Boot WR; Henderson JM
Vision Res; 2011 Mar; 51(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 21310171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inspection time and visual-perceptual processing.
Garaas TW; Pomplun M
Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):523-37. PubMed ID: 18191437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
