These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16499886)

  • 21. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause.
    Hunt AR; von Mühlenen A; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):271-84. PubMed ID: 17469968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Event-related potentials during preattentional processing of color stimuli.
    Liu T; Shi J
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(12):1221-5. PubMed ID: 18628669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc.
    Brisson B; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hierarchical error processing: different errors, different systems.
    Krigolson OE; Holroyd CB
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():70-80. PubMed ID: 17498670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How does error correction differ from error signaling? An event-related potential study.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 16483557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive task fulfilment may decrease gaze control performances.
    Meyer C; Gauchard GC; Deviterne D; Perrin PP
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Dec; 92(5):861-6. PubMed ID: 17655886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 18031856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the origin of the hemianopic line bisection error purely visual? Evidence from eye movements in simulated hemianopia.
    Schuett S; Kentridge RW; Zihl J; Heywood CA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1668-80. PubMed ID: 19362571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Misdirection, attention and awareness: inattentional blindness reveals temporal relationship between eye movements and visual awareness.
    Kuhn G; Findlay JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 19459083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.
    Weaver MD; van Zoest W; Hickey C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():880-894. PubMed ID: 27836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ERP correlates of conscious error recognition: aware and unaware errors in an antisaccade task.
    Endrass T; Reuter B; Kathmann N
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 26(6):1714-20. PubMed ID: 17880402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching.
    Mueller SC; Swainson R; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1157():56-65. PubMed ID: 17544384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.