These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1650032)
1. Second guessing. Is more oversight needed to curb scientific cheating? Beardsley T Sci Am; 1991 Jun; 264(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 1650032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases. Mosimann JE IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity. Price AR J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research integrity. Thomas A Nature; 1995 Jan; 373(6509):10. PubMed ID: 7800026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The frustrations of scientific misconduct. Kassirer JP N Engl J Med; 1993 Jun; 328(22):1634-6. PubMed ID: 8387639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What to do about scientific misconduct. Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bill would force journals to follow misconduct rules. Anderson C Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):7. PubMed ID: 1315423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties. Soskolne CL J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]