186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16500737)
21. Pedicle screw fixation strength: a biomechanical comparison between 4.5-mm and 5.5-mm diameter screws in osteoporotic upper thoracic vertebrae.
Tsai KJ; Murakami H; Horton WC; Fei Q; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 19327262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation of pull-out strength of cement-augmented pedicle screws with CT-volumetric measurement of cement.
Fölsch C; Goost H; Figiel J; Paletta JR; Schultz W; Lakemeier S
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Dec; 57(6):473-80. PubMed ID: 23152399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area.
Mischkowski RA; Kneuertz P; Florvaag B; Lazar F; Koebke J; Zöller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(10):948-54. PubMed ID: 18774694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparative biomechanical studies of conventional and self-tapping cortical bone screws].
Hess T; Hopf T; Fritsch E; Mittelmeier H
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1991; 129(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 1833915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Holding power of orthopedic screws in the large metacarpal and metatarsal bones of calves.
Blikslager AT; Bowman KF; Abrams CF; Seaboch TR; Hunt EL
Am J Vet Res; 1994 Mar; 55(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 8192269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs: a study using tapped and untapped pilot holes.
Pfeiffer FM; Abernathie DL; Smith DE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E867-70. PubMed ID: 17077722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical evaluation of fracture fixation augmented with tricalcium phosphate bone cement in a porous osteoporotic cancellous bone model.
Collinge C; Merk B; Lautenschlager EP
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Feb; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17304068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of repetitive pilot-hole use on the insertion torque and pullout strength of vertebral system screws.
Defino HL; Rosa RC; Silva P; Shimano AC; Volpon JB; de Paula FJ; Schleicher P; Schnake K; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):871-6. PubMed ID: 19531995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws.
Heidemann W; Terheyden H; Louis Gerlach K
J Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11308282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of contributions of orthodontic mini-screw design factors based on FE analysis and the Taguchi method.
Lin CL; Yu JH; Liu HL; Lin CH; Lin YS
J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(11):2174-81. PubMed ID: 20466376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
Gupta A; Lattermann C; Busam M; Riff A; Bach BR; Wang VM
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Current evaluation of a self-snapping screw system in traumatologic and orthodontic surgery].
Ducours JL; Ardanza B; Modschiedler T; Gueroult JM; Caix P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1992; 93(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 1502451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation.
Kiner DW; Wybo CD; Sterba W; Yeni YN; Bartol SW; Vaidya R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2618-22. PubMed ID: 19011543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
DiPaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Osteosynthesis of the middle third of the face. A comparative analysis of screws inserted with or without preliminary tapping].
Bähr W
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1993; 94(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 8456240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mechanical testing of small fracture implants for comparison of insertion and failure torques.
Glauser CR; Oden ZM; Ambrose CG; Willits MB; Coupe KJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Oct; 123(8):388-91. PubMed ID: 14574594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A biomechanical comparison of two patterns of screw insertion.
Lichtblau S; Gallina J; Nasser P; Munyoki M; Jepsen K
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 19093901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pullout strength of self-tapping screws inserted to different depths.
Berkowitz R; Njus G; Vrabec G
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Aug; 19(7):462-5. PubMed ID: 16056078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
