These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16501657)

  • 1. The Poehlman case: running away from the truth.
    Dahlberg JE; Mahler CC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2006 Jan; 12(1):157-73. PubMed ID: 16501657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incarceration, restitution, and lifetime debarment: legal consequences of scientific misconduct in the Eric Poehlman case: Commentary on: "Scientific forensics: how the office of research integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review".
    Tilden SJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):737-41. PubMed ID: 20842537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.
    Sox HC; Rennie D
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Apr; 144(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 16522625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits.
    Loikith L; Bauchwitz R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1027-1049. PubMed ID: 27349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
    Interlandi J
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
    Price AR; Daroff RB
    Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is Recklessness in Scientific Research? The Frank Sauer Case.
    Resnik DB; Smith EM; Chen SH; Goller C
    Account Res; 2017; 24(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 29106296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abass Alavi: A giant in Nuclear Medicine turns 80 and is still going strong!
    Høilund-Carlsen PF
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2018; 21(1):85-87. PubMed ID: 29550853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
    Price AR
    Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life After Research Misconduct.
    Galbraith KL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud.
    Stone R; Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5190):1468-9. PubMed ID: 7985007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
    Reynolds SM
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HHS: Gallo guilty of misconduct.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):168-70. PubMed ID: 8380653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
    Scarr S; Ernhart CB
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicare and state health programs: fraud and abuse; issuance of advisory opinions by the OIG--HHS. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(136):38311-26. PubMed ID: 10183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review.
    Pownall M
    BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7192):1164. PubMed ID: 10221931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.