These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16502040)

  • 1. The Great Lakes, an ecosystem rehabilitated, but still under threat.
    Shear H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):199-225. PubMed ID: 16502040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological monitoring for assessing the state of the nearshore and open waters of the Great Lakes.
    Neilson MA; Painter DS; Warren G; Hites RA; Basu I; Weseloh DV; Whittle DM; Christie G; Barbiero R; Tuchman M; Johannsson OE; Nalepa TF; Edsall TA; Fleischer G; Bronte C; Smith SB; Baumann PC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 88(1-3):103-17. PubMed ID: 14570412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eco-toxicology: traditional and post-normal interpretations of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
    Gilbertson M
    Ecotoxicology; 2000 Dec; 9(6):365-75. PubMed ID: 11214441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diversionary reframing of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
    Gilbertson M; Watterson AE
    J Public Health Policy; 2007 Jul; 28(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 17585321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.
    Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Fish Telemetry in Rehabilitation Planning, Management, and Monitoring in Areas of Concern in the Laurentian Great Lakes.
    Brooks JL; Boston C; Doka S; Gorsky D; Gustavson K; Hondorp D; Isermann D; Midwood JD; Pratt TC; Rous AM; Withers JL; Krueger CC; Cooke SJ
    Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 60(6):1139-1154. PubMed ID: 28939998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An expanded fish-based index of biotic integrity for Great Lakes coastal wetlands.
    Cooper MJ; Lamberti GA; Moerke AH; Ruetz CR; Wilcox DA; Brady VJ; Brown TN; Ciborowski JJH; Gathman JP; Grabas GP; Johnson LB; Uzarski DG
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Sep; 190(10):580. PubMed ID: 30203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development and implementation of indicators of ecosystem health in the Great Lakes basin.
    Shear H; Stadler-Salt N; Bertram P; Horvatin P
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 88(1-3):119-52. PubMed ID: 14570413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing mercury in the great lakes: an analytical review of abatement policies.
    Mohapatra SP; Nikolova I; Mitchell A
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 16698174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bi-national assessment of the Great Lakes: SOLEC partnerships.
    Bertram P; Stadler-Salt N; Horvatin P; Shear H;
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):27-33. PubMed ID: 12620001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a new approach to cumulative effects assessment: a northern river ecosystem example.
    Dubé M; Johnson B; Dunn G; Culp J; Cash K; Munkittrick K; Wong I; Hedley K; Booty W; Lam D; Resler O; Storey A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):87-115. PubMed ID: 16532283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives.
    de Jonge VN; Elliott M; Brauer VS
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006; 53(1-4):5-19. PubMed ID: 16426645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inner Workings: Smart-sensor network keeps close eye on lake ecosystem.
    Gilbert N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(5):828-830. PubMed ID: 29382790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Progress toward delisting a Great Lakes Area of Concern: the role of integrated research and monitoring in the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan.
    Hall JD; O'Connor K; Ranieri J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):227-43. PubMed ID: 16447030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Water quality objectives: yardsticks of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
    Gilbertson M
    Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Mar; 107(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 10069776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indicators show mixed results for the Great Lakes.
    J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec; 2(6):95N. PubMed ID: 11296769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial distribution and trends of total mercury in waters of the Great Lakes and connecting channels using an improved sampling technique.
    Dove A; Hill B; Klawunn P; Waltho J; Backus S; McCrea RC
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Feb; 161():328-34. PubMed ID: 21715070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Great Lakes' cleanup too little, too late.
    Pelley J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(23):446A-447A. PubMed ID: 12523397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applications of numerical sediment quality targets for assessing sediment quality conditions in a US Great Lakes Area of Concern.
    Crane JL; MacDonald DD
    Environ Manage; 2003 Jul; 32(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 14703918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Finnish Baltic Sea Research Programme (BIREME).
    Aarnio T
    Ambio; 2007 Apr; 36(2-3):123. PubMed ID: 17520923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.