191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16502057)
1. Renal anatomical factors for the lower calyceal stone formation.
Gozen AS; Kilic AS; Aktoz T; Akdere H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2006; 38(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 16502057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is infundibuloureteropelvic angle (IUPA) a significant risk factor in formation of inferior calyceal calculi?
Nabi G; Gupta NP; Mandal S; Hemal AK; Dogra PN; Ansari MS
Eur Urol; 2002 Dec; 42(6):590-3. PubMed ID: 12477655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy of the collecting system of lower pole of the kidney in patients with a single renal stone: a comparative study with individuals with normal kidneys.
Zomorrodi A; Buhluli A; Fathi S
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 Jul; 21(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 20587870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients.
Ozgür Tan M; Karaoğlan U; Sen I; Deniz N; Bozkirli I
Eur Urol; 2003 Feb; 43(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 12565778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy?
Fong YK; Peh SO; Ho SH; Ng FC; Quek PL; Ng KK
Int J Urol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):700-3. PubMed ID: 15379931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): the impact of radiological anatomy.
Lin CC; Hsu YS; Chen KK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Oct; 71(10):496-501. PubMed ID: 18955183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy on the stone formation in patients with lower pole renal stones.
Balawender K; Orkisz S
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2018; 77(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 28653304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between the stone-bearing and normal contralateral kidney on stone formation in adult patients with lower caliceal stones.
Kupeli B; Tunc L; Acar C; Gurocak S; Alkibay T; Guneri C; Bozkirli I
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(3):287-92; discussion 292-4. PubMed ID: 16813671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?
Madbouly K; Sheir KZ; Elsobky E
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1415-8. PubMed ID: 11342888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FREQUENCY AND FACTORS EFFECTING NON CLEARANCE OF LOWER POLE RENAL STONES.
Ullah A; Zubair M; Khan N; Malik A
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(2):384-7. PubMed ID: 26411123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Arzoz-Fabregas M; Ibarz-Servio L; Blasco-Casares FJ; Ramon-Dalmau M; Ruiz-Marcellan FJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(2):140-9; discussion 149-50. PubMed ID: 19409117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic predictors of formation of lower caliceal calculi: is it the time for three-dimensional computed tomography urography?
El-Assmy A; Abo-Elghar ME; El-Nahas AR; Youssef RF; El-Diasty T; Sheir KZ
J Endourol; 2008 Sep; 22(9):2175-9. PubMed ID: 18811576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Ruggera L; Beltrami P; Ballario R; Cavalleri S; Cazzoletti L; Artibani W
Int J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 15985072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones.
Sahinkanat T; Ekerbicer H; Onal B; Tansu N; Resim S; Citgez S; Oner A
Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):801-5. PubMed ID: 18279941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of lower infundibulopelvic angle, lower infundibulum diameter and inferior calyceal length on stone formation.
Gökalp A; Tahmaz L; Peşkircioglu L; Ozgök Y; Saglam M; Kibar Y; Harmankaya AC
Urol Int; 1999; 63(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 10592498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.
Gupta NP; Singh DV; Hemal AK; Mandal S
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10604306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is pelvicaliceal anatomy a risk factor for stone formation in patients with solitary upper caliceal stone?
Acar C; Küpeli B; Gürocak S; Alkibay T; Güneri C; Ozkan S; Bozkirli I
Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1159-63. PubMed ID: 16750255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones.
Resorlu B; Oguz U; Resorlu EB; Oztuna D; Unsal A
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 21855968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
