These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16502404)

  • 1. Centralizing the non-central chi-square: A new method to correct for population stratification in genetic case-control association studies.
    Gorroochurn P; Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):277-89. PubMed ID: 16502404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust genomic control and robust delta centralization tests for case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Zhang H; Yang Y; Zheng G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17310128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case-control studies of association in structured or admixed populations.
    Pritchard JK; Donnelly P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 11855957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. I. Elevation in false positive rates and comparison to confounding risk ratios (a simulation study).
    Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Gorroochurn P; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies.
    Dadd T; Weale ME; Lewis CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 19051284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new association test based on Chi-square partition for case-control GWA studies.
    Chen Z
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):658-63. PubMed ID: 22009790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computing power in case-control association studies through the use of quadratic approximations: application to meta-statistics.
    Guedj M; Della-Chiesa E; Picard F; Nuel G
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):262-70. PubMed ID: 17032289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delta-centralization fails to control for population stratification in genetic association studies.
    Dadd T; Lewis CM; Weale ME
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 20389097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studying the joint effects of population stratification and sampling in case-control association studies.
    Cheng KF; Lee JY; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20357476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-control association studies in mixed populations: correcting using genomic control.
    Shmulewitz D; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):145-53. PubMed ID: 15812171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing association with interactions by partitioning chi-squares.
    Yang Y; He C; Ott J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18798840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
    El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring case-control genetic association tests using phase diagrams.
    Li W; Suh YJ; Yang Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2008 Dec; 32(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 18786862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical Bayes prioritization of marker associations from a genome-wide association scan for further investigation.
    Lewinger JP; Conti DV; Baurley JW; Triche TJ; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):871-82. PubMed ID: 17654612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait Loci with missing completely at random genotype data.
    Fan R; Liu L; Jung J; Zhong M
    Behav Genet; 2008 May; 38(3):316-36. PubMed ID: 18306033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.
    Dominicus A; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK; Pedersen NL; Palmgren J
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16474914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian inference of epistatic interactions in case-control studies.
    Zhang Y; Liu JS
    Nat Genet; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1167-73. PubMed ID: 17721534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies.
    Wojcik J; Forner K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.