These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16502841)

  • 1. Attentional selection: A salience-based competition for representation.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1190-8. PubMed ID: 16502841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience.
    Mounts JR; Tomaselli RG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 15698824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of salience in localized attentional interference.
    Mounts JR; Gavett BE
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(13):1575-88. PubMed ID: 15126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired selection of a previously ignored singleton: Evidence for salience map plastic changes.
    Turatto M; Valsecchi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 34498985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-salience and the time-course of saccade trajectory deviations.
    van Zoest W; Donk M; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):16. PubMed ID: 22923727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.
    Goschy H; Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 24323673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biased Competition between Targets and Distractors Reduces Attentional Suppression: Evidence from the Positivity Posterior Contralateral and Distractor Positivity.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1563-1575. PubMed ID: 35640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Salient collinear grouping diminishes local salience in visual search: an eye movement study.
    Jingling L; Tang DL; Tseng CH
    J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 24113088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.