These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16502841)
21. Event-related potentials reveal the effect of prior knowledge on competition for representation and attentional capture. Hilimire MR; Corballis PM Psychophysiology; 2014 Jan; 51(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 24147640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation. Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Attentional selection by distractor suppression. Caputo G; Guerra S Vision Res; 1998 Mar; 38(5):669-89. PubMed ID: 9604099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task. van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing? Lamy D; Tsal Y; Egeth HE Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):621-9. PubMed ID: 14620356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies. Biggs AT; Gibson BS Front Psychol; 2013; 4():326. PubMed ID: 23801969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach. Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention. Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: intertrial priming does. Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J Percept Psychophys; 2005 Nov; 67(8):1354-61. PubMed ID: 16555587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience. Lu S; Han S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020). Ramgir A; Lamy D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):852-861. PubMed ID: 37276124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference. McCarley JS; Mounts JR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template. Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]