These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16502841)

  • 41. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 20045879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Uncertainty as a determinant of attentional control settings.
    Kim H; Park BY; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1415-1425. PubMed ID: 30734186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
    Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 15521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Attentional capture in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Shih SI; Reeves A
    Spat Vis; 2007; 20(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 17594797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Awareness and Stimulus-Driven Spatial Attention as Independent Processes.
    Baier D; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():352. PubMed ID: 32982706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():125-37. PubMed ID: 24973562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection.
    Mast F; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.
    Lamy D; Tsal Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 12199317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.
    Valsecchi M; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):649-666. PubMed ID: 35851440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.
    Lawrence RK; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning.
    Hanne AA; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1672. PubMed ID: 36717593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Positional priming of pop-out: a relational-encoding account.
    Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 20462304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom.
    Cave KR; Chen Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1822-38. PubMed ID: 27250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.