169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16503170)
1. A novel quantitative cross-validation of different cortical surface reconstruction algorithms using MRI phantom.
Lee JK; Lee JM; Kim JS; Kim IY; Evans AC; Kim SI
Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):572-84. PubMed ID: 16503170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of LDDMM, FreeSurfer, and CARET for cortical surface mapping.
Zhong J; Phua DY; Qiu A
Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 20381626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A robust and accurate algorithm for estimating the complexity of the cortical surface.
Jiang J; Zhu W; Shi F; Zhang Y; Lin L; Jiang T
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(1):122-30. PubMed ID: 18511127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel quantitative validation of the cortical surface reconstruction algorithm using MRI phantom: issues on local geometric accuracy and cortical thickness.
Lee J; Lee JM; Kim JH; Kim IY; Evans AC; Kim SI
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):183-90. PubMed ID: 17354889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative comparison of two cortical surface extraction methods using MRI phantoms.
Eskildsen SF; Ostergaard LR
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 18051085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated 3-D extraction and evaluation of the inner and outer cortical surfaces using a Laplacian map and partial volume effect classification.
Kim JS; Singh V; Lee JK; Lerch J; Ad-Dab'bagh Y; MacDonald D; Lee JM; Kim SI; Evans AC
Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):210-21. PubMed ID: 15896981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An efficient algorithm for topologically correct segmentation of the cortical sheet in anatomical mr volumes.
Kriegeskorte N; Goebel R
Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):329-46. PubMed ID: 11467907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images.
Xu C; Pham DL; Rettmann ME; Yu DN; Prince JL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jun; 18(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 10463126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CRUISE: cortical reconstruction using implicit surface evolution.
Han X; Pham DL; Tosun D; Rettmann ME; Xu C; Prince JL
Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):997-1012. PubMed ID: 15528100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A fast, model-independent method for cerebral cortical thickness estimation using MRI.
Scott ML; Bromiley PA; Thacker NA; Hutchinson CE; Jackson A
Med Image Anal; 2009 Apr; 13(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 19068276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated 3-D extraction of inner and outer surfaces of cerebral cortex from MRI.
MacDonald D; Kabani N; Avis D; Evans AC
Neuroimage; 2000 Sep; 12(3):340-56. PubMed ID: 10944416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human cerebral cortex: a system for the integration of volume- and surface-based representations.
Makris N; Kaiser J; Haselgrove C; Seidman LJ; Biederman J; Boriel D; Valera EM; Papadimitriou GM; Fischl B; Caviness VS; Kennedy DN
Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 16920366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of three cortical surface flattening methods.
Ju L; Hurdal MK; Stern J; Rehm K; Schaper K; Rottenberg D
Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 16112878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated cortical projection of head-surface locations for transcranial functional brain mapping.
Okamoto M; Dan I
Neuroimage; 2005 May; 26(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 15862201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A geometric method for automatic extraction of sulcal fundi.
Kao CY; Hofer M; Sapiro G; Stem J; Rehm K; Rottenberg DA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Apr; 26(4):530-40. PubMed ID: 17427740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain segmentation and the generation of cortical surfaces.
Joshi M; Cui J; Doolittle K; Joshi S; Van Essen D; Wang L; Miller MI
Neuroimage; 1999 May; 9(5):461-76. PubMed ID: 10329286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A curvature-based approach to estimate local gyrification on the cortical surface.
Luders E; Thompson PM; Narr KL; Toga AW; Jancke L; Gaser C
Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1224-30. PubMed ID: 16223589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of cortical thickness in 3D brain MRI data: validation of the Laplacian method.
Haidar H; Soul JS
J Neuroimaging; 2006 Apr; 16(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 16629737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomically informed interpolation of fMRI data on the cortical surface.
Grova C; Makni S; Flandin G; Ciuciu P; Gotman J; Poline JB
Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1475-86. PubMed ID: 16650778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ROC-based assessments of 3D cortical surface-matching algorithms.
Bansal R; Staib LH; Whiteman R; Wang YM; Peterson BS
Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 15588606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
