319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16504017)
1. Willingness to pay for health care services in common cold, retinal detachment, and myocardiac infarction: an internet survey in Japan.
Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16504017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of factors affecting willingness to pay for cardiovascular disease-related medical services.
Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
Int Heart J; 2006 Mar; 47(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 16607054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Willingness to pay for a reduction in mortality risk after a myocardial infarction: an application of the contingent valuation method to the case of eplerenone.
Pinto-Prades JL; Farreras V; de Bobadilla JF
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Feb; 9(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17447095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of three contingent valuation question formats in south-east Nigeria.
Onwujekwe O; Fox-Rushby J; Hanson K
Health Econ; 2005 May; 14(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 15386652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso.
Dong H; Kouyate B; Cairns J; Mugisha F; Sauerborn R
Health Econ; 2003 Oct; 12(10):849-62. PubMed ID: 14508869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of the economic value of primary care services: a Willingness to Pay study.
Martín-Fernández J; Gómez-Gascón T; Oliva-Moreno J; del Cura-González MI; Domínguez-Bidagor J; Beamud-Lagos M; Sanz-Cuesta T
Health Policy; 2010 Mar; 94(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 19945763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Willingness to pay for public health services in rural Central Java, Indonesia: methodological considerations when using the contingent valuation method.
Shono A; Kondo M; Ohmae H; Okubo I
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 110():31-40. PubMed ID: 24713191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing a hypothetical cure for rheumatoid arthritis using the contingent valuation methodology: the patient perspective.
Fautrel B; Clarke AE; Guillemin F; Adam V; St-Pierre Y; Panaritis T; Fortin PR; Menard HA; Donaldson C; Penrod JR
J Rheumatol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):443-53. PubMed ID: 15742435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using willingness to pay to measure family members' preferences in mental health.
Mulvaney-Day NE
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Jun; 8(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 15998979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes.
Bijlenga D; Bonsel GJ; Birnie E
Health Econ; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1392-406. PubMed ID: 20967891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Acceptance and understandability of various methods of health valuations for the chronically ill: willingness to pay, visual analogue scale and rating scale].
Meder M; Farin E
Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Nov; 71(11):e62-71. PubMed ID: 20094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of 'reference goods' in contingent valuation: should we help respondents to 'construct' their willingness to pay?
Smith RD
Health Econ; 2007 Dec; 16(12):1319-32. PubMed ID: 17328037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study.
Bärnighausen T; Liu Y; Zhang X; Sauerborn R
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jul; 7():114. PubMed ID: 17659084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cost-benefit analysis using contingent valuation techniques: a feasibility study in spinal surgery.
Haefeli M; Elfering A; McIntosh E; Gray A; Sukthankar A; Boos N
Value Health; 2008; 11(4):575-88. PubMed ID: 18179657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference?
O'Brien B; Viramontes JL
Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 7934716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Willingness to pay for mass screening for prostate cancer: a contingent valuation survey.
Yasunaga H
Int J Urol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):102-5; discussion 105. PubMed ID: 18184186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the context of kidney transplantation.
Kontodimopoulos N; Niakas D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 16412242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?
Shiroiwa T; Sung YK; Fukuda T; Lang HC; Bae SC; Tsutani K
Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 19(4):422-37. PubMed ID: 19382128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between reliability and size of willingness-to-pay values: a qualitative insight.
Smith RD
Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 16929470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality-adjusted life years was a poor predictor of women's willingness to pay in acute and chronic conditions: results of a survey.
Franic DM; Pathak DS; Gafni A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 15718119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
