These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1650429)

  • 1. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct. NIH staffer finds warm reception on other side.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):98. PubMed ID: 1309600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robocops: Stewart and Feder's mechanized misconduct search.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Apr; 350(6318):454-5. PubMed ID: 1849615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change in fraud review proposed.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview.
    Lafollette MC
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10964254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Baltimore case.
    Fielder JH
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 10101677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft responses to misconduct.
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH Director Healy back in charge of misconduct office.
    Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5029):183. PubMed ID: 1925567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Office of Scientific Integrity.
    Raub WF
    Lancet; 1991 Apr; 337(8747):980. PubMed ID: 1678060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
    Pascal CB
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.