These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16504453)
1. When the MPU becomes the AMPB. Wissow L Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Apr; 61(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16504453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retraction of research findings. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. CMAJ; 1988 Apr; 138(7):596. PubMed ID: 3281736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retraction of research findings. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med; 1988 Feb; 108(2):304. PubMed ID: 3277511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research. Marchant S Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Publishing of scientific studies is no longer dependent on considerations of space in medical journals]. Eliasson M Lakartidningen; 2001 Nov; 98(47):5394. PubMed ID: 11763644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bad papers by Caveman. J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Two years with EBM in Lakartidningen. Clinical research and routine health care closer to each other]. Werkö L; Asplund K; Aspelin P; Britton M; Eliasson M; af Geijerstam JL; Thelander S Lakartidningen; 2002 Sep; 99(36):3478-9, 3482. PubMed ID: 12362745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is lumping peer-reviewed case reports together with non-peer-reviewed comments for publication as letters to the editor appropriate? Cappell MS Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 105(8):1901; author reply 1901-2. PubMed ID: 20686469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The pursuit of research publications. Payne JN; Block M; Milner PC J Public Health Med; 1995 Sep; 17(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 8527175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Is Tidsskriftet's publishing time too long?]. Sellevold OF; Bratlid D Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jun; 130(12):1228-31. PubMed ID: 20567273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality in epidemiological research: should we be submitting papers before we have the results and submitting more hypothesis-generating research? Lawlor DA Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):940-3. PubMed ID: 17875575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A withdrawn prepublication. Dean PB Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9565):901. PubMed ID: 17368138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Ding dong the witch is dead!' the demise of the research quality framework. Happell B Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Apr; 17(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 18307595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retraction of research findings. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Feb; 296(6619):400. PubMed ID: 3125921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care. Kranke P BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Family medicine research. Reid T Can Fam Physician; 1995 Aug; 41():1277-9, 1282-4. PubMed ID: 7580372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecstasy agonistes: a retracted study on a controversial substance raises questions about the reliability of government-sponsored research on drugs. Bartlett T Chron High Educ; 2004 Feb; 50(25):A14-6. PubMed ID: 15287142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]