171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16504455)
1. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in oesophageal malignancy.
Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 32(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16504455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.
Saha AK; Sutton C; Rotimi O; Dexter S; Sue-Ling H; Sarela AI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 19252949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The degree of circumferential tumour involvement as a prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer.
Sillah K; Pritchard SA; Watkins GR; McShane J; West CM; Page R; Welch IM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 36(2):368-73. PubMed ID: 19318270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer and its implications for adjuvant treatment.
O'Neill JR; Stephens NA; Save V; Kamel HM; Phillips HA; Driscoll PJ; Paterson-Brown S
Br J Surg; 2013 Jul; 100(8):1055-63. PubMed ID: 23616367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor length as a prognostic factor in esophageal malignancy: univariate and multivariate survival analyses.
Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 93(4):258-67. PubMed ID: 16496364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Verhage RJ; Zandvoort HJ; ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 21566512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circumferential margin positivity and its impact on prognosis in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.
Sujendran V; Wheeler J; Baron R; Warren BF; Maynard N
Br J Surg; 2008 Feb; 95(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 17948302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route.
Scheepers JJ; van der Peet DL; Veenhof AA; Cuesta MA
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19196265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of positive circumferential margin on survival following oesophagectomy using the new 7th TNM classification.
Theologou T; Diab M; Kyaw PA; Gosney JR; McShane J; Howes N; Page RD; Shackcloth M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 44(5):855-9. PubMed ID: 23650023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors influencing survival following esophagectomy for cancer.
Mirnezami R; Rohatgi A; Sutcliffe RP; Hamouda A; Chandrakumaran K; Botha A; Mason RC
Int J Surg; 2010; 8(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19897061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of lymph node involvement in T2 or T3 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Shimada H; Okazumi S; Shiratori T; Akutsu Y; Matsubara H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(93):1039-43. PubMed ID: 19760937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer.
Quinn LM; Hollis AC; Hodson J; Elshafie MA; Hallissey MT; Whiting JL; Griffiths EA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 29843937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of cancer within 1 mm of the circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer patients following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Salih T; Jose P; Mehta SP; Mirza A; Udall G; Pritchard SA; Hayden JD; Grabsch HI
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 43(3):562-7. PubMed ID: 22665383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of circumferential resection margin clearance criteria with survival after surgery for cancer of esophagus.
Rao VS; Yeung MM; Cooke J; Salim E; Jain PK
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):745-9. PubMed ID: 22161989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer.
Dexter SP; Sue-Ling H; McMahon MJ; Quirke P; Mapstone N; Martin IG
Gut; 2001 May; 48(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 11302966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of long-term survival after resection of esophageal carcinoma with nonregional nodal metastases.
Lee PC; Port JL; Paul S; Stiles BM; Altorki NK
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):186-92; discussion 192-3. PubMed ID: 19559222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. En bloc vs transhiatal esophagectomy for stage T3 N1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus.
Johansson J; DeMeester TR; Hagen JA; DeMeester SR; Peters JH; Oberg S; Bremner CG
Arch Surg; 2004 Jun; 139(6):627-31; discussion 631-3. PubMed ID: 15197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percent positive axillary lymph node metastasis predicts survival in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Lale Atahan I; Yildiz F; Ozyigit G; Sari S; Gurkaynak M; Selek U; Hayran M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 17924207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement.
Suttie SA; Nanthakumaran S; Mofidi R; Rapson T; Gilbert FJ; Thompson AM; Park KG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 22154884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of circumferential resection margin status on loco-regional recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Park HJ; Kim HJ; Chie EK; Kang CH; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 107(7):762-6. PubMed ID: 23280705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
