These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16505461)

  • 1. What is the best evidence for determining harms of medical treatment?
    Vandenbroucke JP
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(5):645-6. PubMed ID: 16505461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
    Papanikolaou PN; Christidi GD; Ioannidis JP
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 16505459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controversy over "contradiction": Should randomized trials always trump observational studies?
    Fletcher AE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):384-6. PubMed ID: 19217953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Pereira C; Castilho E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Epidemiology versus clinical trial. A five-round-match on scientific reliability].
    Lafolie P
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3132-4. PubMed ID: 12198935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.
    Barton S
    BMJ; 2000 Jul; 321(7256):255-6. PubMed ID: 10915111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From observational studies to randomized trials: asking the right question at the right time.
    Neaton JD; Mugglin AS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 33(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 16899092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled studies: scientific evidence or disinformation?
    Ekroth R; Ståhle E
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2011 Jun; 45(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 21388251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for Health Decision Making - Beyond Randomized, Controlled Trials.
    Frieden TR
    N Engl J Med; 2017 Aug; 377(5):465-475. PubMed ID: 28767357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the least biased studies.
    Prescrire Int; 2015 Apr; 24(159):102. PubMed ID: 25941707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of epidemiological studies should not be downplayed.
    Feigin VL; Howard G
    Stroke; 2008 Jan; 39(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 18006859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine: new priority for an old paradigm.
    Feussner JR
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jul; 11(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 8797106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms.
    Roberts H
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e815. PubMed ID: 22318438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. n-of-1 randomized controlled trials: an opportunity for complementary and alternative medicine evaluation.
    Johnston BC; Mills E
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Dec; 10(6):979-84. PubMed ID: 15673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expanding the evidence base in transplantation: more and better randomized trials, and extending the value of observational data.
    Craig JC; Webster AC; Mitchell A; Irwig L
    Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18622275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valuing evidence: bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine.
    Borgerson K
    Perspect Biol Med; 2009; 52(2):218-33. PubMed ID: 19395821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consideration of medical research vs. scientific research.
    Pyle DE
    Med Hypotheses; 2005; 65(6):1199. PubMed ID: 16144744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parachute approach to evidence based medicine: as obvious as ABC.
    Reeves BC
    BMJ; 2006 Oct; 333(7572):807; discussion 807-8. PubMed ID: 17038743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.