These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1650548)

  • 1. Not all nonpalpable breast cancers are alike.
    Franceschi D; Crowe JP; Lie S; Duchesneau R; Zollinger R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM
    Arch Surg; 1991 Aug; 126(8):967-70; discussion 970-1. PubMed ID: 1650548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast biopsy for calcifications in nonpalpable breast lesions. A prospective study.
    Franceschi D; Crowe J; Zollinger R; Duchesneau R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM
    Arch Surg; 1990 Feb; 125(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 2154171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
    Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonpalpable ductal carcinoma in situ versus infiltrating carcinoma of the breast--can they be differentiated by mammography?
    Hermann G; Keller RJ; Halton K; Schwartz I; Rabinowitz JG; Tartter P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Jun; 42(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 1647259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitfalls in mammography screening policy: breast cancer in a 26-year-old patient.
    Castelo-Branco C; Gratacós E; Fernandez PL; Velasco M; Iglesias X; Fortuny A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8387938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance and staging of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.
    Schwartz GF; Feig SA; Patchefsky AS
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jan; 166(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 2827328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proliferative disease and atypia in biopsies performed for nonpalpable lesions detected mammographically.
    Rubin E; Visscher DW; Alexander RW; Urist MM; Maddox WA
    Cancer; 1988 May; 61(10):2077-82. PubMed ID: 3359405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
    Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Holland R; Hendriks JH; van der Sluis RF; Lubbers EJ; de Boer HH
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 2825366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
    Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of localized breast cancer by prospective mammographic screening criteria.
    Knaus JV; Dolan JR; Isaacs JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 158(1):147-9. PubMed ID: 2827485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
    Stomper PC; Connolly JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
    Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
    Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
    Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation.
    Hassell P; Klein-Parker H; Worth A; Poon P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Dec; 50(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10659059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast biopsy for nonpalpable lesions: a worthwhile endeavor?
    Opie H; Estes NC; Jewell WR; Chang CH; Thomas JA; Estes MA
    Am Surg; 1993 Aug; 59(8):490-3; discussion 493-4. PubMed ID: 8393310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Nonpalpable is not a synonym for inconsequential.
    Schwartz GF; Carter DL; Conant EF; Gannon FH; Finkel GC; Feig SA
    Cancer; 1994 Mar; 73(6):1660-5. PubMed ID: 8156493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast specimen microcalcifications: radiographic validation and pathologic-radiologic correlation.
    D'Orsi CJ; Reale FR; Davis MA; Brown VJ
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):397-401. PubMed ID: 1648756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of excised breast lesions: use of fresh tissue needle aspirates obtained under guidance with mammography of the specimen.
    Stomper PC; Stewart CC; Penetrante RB; Nava ME; Tsangaris TN
    Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 1329141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.