440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506326)
61. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Advance directives and do not resuscitate orders at Bowman Gray-Baptist Hospital Medical Center.
Vance RP; Ciancio J; West E
N C Med J; 1993 Aug; 54(8):373-7. PubMed ID: 8377848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Instructions for the Valley of the Shadow: a medical directive (living will).
Reisner A;
United Synag Rev; 1992; 44(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 11659435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Long-term care: end-of-life issues. End-of-year issue brief.
Jones CA; Miller KG
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2008 Jan; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 18345562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. To treat or not to treat?
Burgess KL; Riley P
Provider; 2000 Nov; 26(11):57-9. PubMed ID: 11185339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. A model integrated advance directive for health care unto the third generation.
Weisbard AJ
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):2-12. PubMed ID: 11759721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences?
Schneiderman LJ; Kaplan RM; Pearlman RA; Teetzel H
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 8490215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. End-of-life decisions affect health care providers.
Fade AE
Am Nurse; 1994 Jan; 26(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 8304635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Not for all terminally ill patients.
Ginn D; Zitner D
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Apr; 41():649-52, 655-7. PubMed ID: 7787495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Position statement on laws and regulations concerning life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, for patients lacking decision-making capacity.
Kothare SV; Altman AM; Rodriguez IN
Neurology; 2008 Jan; 70(3):242; author reply 242-3. PubMed ID: 18195272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The Wendland case: on families and fantasies.
Nelson LJ
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(2):8, 12. PubMed ID: 16175728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Refusal of hydration and nutrition: irrelevance of the "artificial" vs "natural" distinction.
Truog RD; Cochrane TI
Arch Intern Med; 2005 Dec 12-26; 165(22):2574-6. PubMed ID: 16344412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. The limits of advance directives: a history and assessment of the Patient Self-Determination Act.
Larson EJ; Eaton TA
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1997; 32(2):249-93. PubMed ID: 11657436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Ad hoc committee on artificial nutrition and hydration of individuals in a permanent vegetative state report.
Ad hoc committee on artificial nutrition and hydration in a permanent vegetative state
Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):227-31. PubMed ID: 15505923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Tracking the storm: the far-reaching power of the forces propelling the Schiavo cases.
Cerminara KL
Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):147-78. PubMed ID: 17099998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Clinical tales in neurology: a vegetative existence.
Nair KR
Issues Med Ethics; 2002; 10(3):55-7. PubMed ID: 16335487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Advance directives: following the patient's wishes.
Lanier ME
Fla Nurse; 2008 Dec; 56(4):21. PubMed ID: 19112753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The Wendland case.
Bernstein M
N Engl J Med; 2002 Oct; 347(14):1119. PubMed ID: 12362023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Making Ohio's do-not-resuscitate law work. A self-study program for health care providers (RNs, LPNs, case managers).
Lycan J
Ohio Nurses Rev; 2000 Sep; 75(8):9-13; quiz 13. PubMed ID: 15706834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Advance directives for emergency medical service workers: the struggle continues.
Sosna D
Bioethics Forum; 1998; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11656889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
