620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506342)
1. Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy.
Suter SM
George Washington Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 72(4):737-814. PubMed ID: 16506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic non-discrimination, privacy and property rights.
Stulic M
E Law; 2000 Jun; 7(2):E5. PubMed ID: 16903021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace.
Feitshans IL
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
Stepanuk NA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Privacy of genetic information.
Setoyama K
Osaka Univ Law Rev; 2005 Feb; 52():75-105. PubMed ID: 16482694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Blood rights: the body and information privacy.
Alston B
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):426-40. PubMed ID: 15957586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whose genes are they anyway?
Nelkin D; Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 1999 May; 45():B6. PubMed ID: 14598853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Safeguarding human genetic privacy.
Judicature; 2003; 86(5):224. PubMed ID: 15744895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The limits of state laws to protect genetic information.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2001 Aug; 345(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11484711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genes and spleens: property, contract, or privacy rights in the human body?
Rao R
J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 17714248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenges of oral-based diagnostics in extending the role of dentistry as a health care profession: property rights, privacy, and informed consent.
Vernillo A; Welie JV; Naidoo S; Malamud D
J Am Coll Dent; 2011; 78(3):33-40. PubMed ID: 22263370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The social response to genetic conditions: beware of the antidiscrimination law.
Epstein RA
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(5):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17848433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Building on relationships of trust in biobank research.
Hansson MG
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):415-8. PubMed ID: 15994363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism.
Gostin LO; Hodge JG
Jurimetrics; 1999; ():21-58. PubMed ID: 12465649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.
Banks TM
Sask Law Rev; 2000; 63(2):539-80. PubMed ID: 12666671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting genetic privacy by permitting employer access only to job-related employee medical information: analysis of a unique Minnesota law.
Rothstein MA; Gelb BD; Craig SG
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(4):399-416. PubMed ID: 9876783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination.
McLochlin DL
John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):609-46. PubMed ID: 16331878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genes, ownership, and indigenous reality.
Gillett G; McKergow F
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2093-104. PubMed ID: 17688984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
Slaughter LM
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA: five distinguishing features for policy analysis.
Green RM; Thomas AM
Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):571-91. PubMed ID: 12731549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
