33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506512)
1. Effects of complex sulphur substrates on sludge bioleaching to improve heavy metal removal and microbial community diversity.
Chang Z; Su B; Zhang C; Zhang C; Song X
Chemosphere; 2023 Oct; 339():139532. PubMed ID: 37467854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variation among species in proteomic sulphur content is related to environmental conditions.
Bragg JG; Thomas D; Baudouin-Cornu P
Proc Biol Sci; 2006 May; 273(1591):1293-300. PubMed ID: 16720405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elemental sulphur in the synthesis of sulphur-containing polymers: reaction mechanisms and green prospects.
Tarasova NP; Zanin AA; Krivoborodov EG; Mezhuev YO
RSC Adv; 2021 Feb; 11(15):9008-9020. PubMed ID: 35423353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biosolids from two-stage bioleaching could produce compost for unrestricted use.
Henry JG; Prasad D
Environ Technol; 2006 Jun; 27(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 16865922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of substrate concentration on the bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge.
Chen YX; Hua YM; Zhang SH
J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(5):788-92. PubMed ID: 15559813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bio-dissolution of spent Ni-Cd batteries by sewage sludge using ferrous ions and elemental sulfur as substrate.
Zhao L; Zhu NW; Wang XH
Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(6):974-81. PubMed ID: 17884135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sewage sludge bioleaching by indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria: effects of ratio of substrate dosage to solid content.
Zhang P; Zhu Y; Zhang G; Zou S; Zeng G; Wu Z
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1394-8. PubMed ID: 18945613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological leaching of heavy metals from anaerobically digested sewage sludge using indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and sulfur waste in a closed system.
Kitada K; Ito A; Yamada K; Aizawa J; Umita T
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 11380206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biological process that reduces metals in municipal sludge to yield sulphur enhanced biosolids.
Seth R; Henry JG; Prasad D
Environ Technol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16506512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation into the potential of biological processing for the removal of metals from sewage sludges.
Lombardi AT; Garcia JĂșnior O
Crit Rev Microbiol; 1999; 25(4):275-88. PubMed ID: 10642888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge.
Singh RP; Agrawal M
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 17320368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]