These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506517)

  • 1. Two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops: methane production, nitrogen mineralisation and heavy metal mobilisation.
    Lehtomäki A; Björnsson L
    Environ Technol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 16506517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops.
    Cirne DG; Lehtomäki A; Björnsson L; Blackall LL
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 103(3):516-27. PubMed ID: 17714384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage and brewery sludges on biogas production and sludge quality.
    Pecharaply A; Parkpian P; Annachhatre AP; Jugsujinda A
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Jun; 42(7):911-23. PubMed ID: 17558772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-stage, batch, leach-bed, thermophilic anaerobic digestion of spent sugar beet pulp.
    Koppar A; Pullammanappallil P
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(8):2831-9. PubMed ID: 17855085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production.
    Lehtomäki A; Huttunen S; Lehtinen TM; Rintala JA
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(8):3267-78. PubMed ID: 17702572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level: is it economically feasible under conditions in Sweden?
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Dec; 28(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 16172872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production.
    Nges IA; Escobar F; Fu X; Björnsson L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21975301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of a fuzzy logic control system for continuous anaerobic digestion of low buffered, acidic energy crops as mono-substrate.
    Scherer P; Lehmann K; Schmidt O; Demirel B
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Feb; 102(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 18988261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biogas from energy crops--optimal pre-treatments and storage, co-digestion and energy balance in boreal conditions.
    Seppälä M; Paavola T; Lehtomäki A; Pakarinen O; Rintala J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 19029729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level in Sweden: scale, choice of substrate and utilisation rate most important parameters for financial feasibility.
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2006 Jul; 29(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent development of anaerobic digestion processes for energy recovery from wastes.
    Nishio N; Nakashimada Y
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2007 Feb; 103(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 17368391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of biogas production from seaweed in batch tests and in UASB reactors combined with the removal of heavy metals.
    Nkemka VN; Murto M
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1573-9. PubMed ID: 20382468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anaerobic digestion of gelatinous water at laboratory and pilot scale and nitrogen inhibition.
    Martinez-Sosa D; Rafrafi Y; Torrijos M; Bernet N; Buitron G; Bosque F; Delgenès JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1735-41. PubMed ID: 18547924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of energy crop substrates on the mass-flow analysis and the residual methane potential at a rural anaerobic digestion plant.
    Resch C; Braun R; Kirchmayr R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18192743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review.
    Chen Y; Cheng JJ; Creamer KS
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4044-64. PubMed ID: 17399981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anaerobic treatment of sludge from a nitrification-denitrification landfill leachate plant.
    Marañón E; Castrillón L; Fernández Y; Fernández E
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 16185860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Co-digestion of energy crops and industrial confectionery by-products with cow manure: batch-scale and farm-scale evaluation.
    Kaparaju P; Luostarinen S; Kalmari E; Kalmari J; Rintala J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(10):275-80. PubMed ID: 12188558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The valuation of malnutrition in the mono-digestion of maize silage by anaerobic batch tests.
    Hinken L; Urban I; Haun E; Urban I; Weichgrebe D; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1453-9. PubMed ID: 18957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the continuous two-stage anaerobic digestion process well suited for all substrates?
    Lindner J; Zielonka S; Oechsner H; Lemmer A
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():470-6. PubMed ID: 26519699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.