These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506612)

  • 1. Fabrication of passive bar attachments.
    Salinas TJ
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(10):708. PubMed ID: 16506612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fabrication of passive bar attachments: Part II--Casting techniques and misfits.
    Salinas TJ
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 18(3):148. PubMed ID: 16734149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The passive fitting implant restoration.
    Rieger M; Olarn RC; Lacefield WR; Lyzak W; Powers JM
    Implant Soc; 1993; 4(2):8-15. PubMed ID: 7908539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Passive definitive fit of bar-supported implant overdentures.
    Longoni S; Sartori M; Ariello F; Anzani M; Baldoni M
    Implant Dent; 2006 Jun; 15(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 16766894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabrication of custom milled attachments with screw fixation.
    Charters RT
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1993 May; 10(4):37-41. PubMed ID: 8362160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixed prosthesis with a milled bar for correcting misangled implants: a clinical report.
    Lee JH; Frias V; Woo C; Maiberg R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 17394909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of direct-indirect method for fabrication of tooth-retained overdenture stud attachments.
    Beygi A; Savabi O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1306-7. PubMed ID: 24939251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Montreal bar: in search of the positive fit.
    Baillie R
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1995 May; 12(4):37-41. PubMed ID: 9586561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The O-ring universal impression technique.
    Hussaini S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 18761567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory technology.
    Marlin GM; Molina G
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):370-3. PubMed ID: 8007030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rotational accuracy of implant components for single-tooth, root-form implants.
    Barzilay I
    Dent Implantol Update; 1991 Jan; 2(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 1364293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. System offers new prosthetic dimension to the restoration of root-form implants.
    Marlin GM
    Dent Implantol Update; 1994 Aug; 5(8):61-4. PubMed ID: 7919424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.