200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506627)
1. Will relaxing Stark bind you tighter?
Terry K
Med Econ; 2006 Feb; 83(3):40-3. PubMed ID: 16506627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Buyer beware: complying with amended stark and anti-kickback regulations.
Klein SR; Fox SJ
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2008; 22(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 19266987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Will you provide IT relief to physicians?
Amatayakul M
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Nov; 60(11):116, 118. PubMed ID: 17094286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bonding with physicians: hospitals and IT donations.
Whitham JC; Bernstein SW
Trustee; 2007; 60(10):29-30. PubMed ID: 18092504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What new Stark rules mean for ORs.
OR Manager; 2004 Jul; 20(7):17. PubMed ID: 15338657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sidestepping Stark. HHS easing way for hospitals to help docs buy IT.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(41):8-9. PubMed ID: 16250146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Seven years until electronic health records: the negative effects of the new Stark exceptions and anti-kickback safe harbors.
Strahan M
J Health Law; 2007; 40(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 17849831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tension over relaxation.
Gardner E
Health Data Manag; 2010 Aug; 18(8):44-7. PubMed ID: 20712187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stark revisions arrive. Docs await CMS referral changes--whatever they are.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):8-9. PubMed ID: 17960699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Safe harbors may cause waves. Not-for-profits may run into IRS problems on IT.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(40):8-9. PubMed ID: 17068861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stark redo. Hospitals hesitate to help digitize doctors' offices until the 'relaxed' rules are further clarified.
Serb C
Hosp Health Netw; 2007 Feb; 81(2):34-6, 38, 2. PubMed ID: 17373535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seeking safe harbors. Health IT groups don't support rules to bypass Stark.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2005 Dec; 35(50):10. PubMed ID: 17899648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A snapshot: defining meaningful use.
Weinstock M
Trustee; 2010 Apr; 63(4):26-7, 1. PubMed ID: 20481254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stark realities for hospitals.
Reynolds M
Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Sep; 58(9):50-5. PubMed ID: 15460937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Stark truth. Government tries to make sense of long and complex law.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Jun; 100(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 15267024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stark laws: then and now.
Sandrick K
Trustee; 2008 Feb; 61(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 18369011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers?
Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM
J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EMR: where we are, where we're going, and some things to consider.
Solomon L
J Med Assoc Ga; 2009; 98(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 19714944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can you prove it? There is no magic bullet for reporting capabilities to meet meaningful use guidelines.
Lawrence D
Healthc Inform; 2010 Apr; 27(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 20426234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readers' perspectives. The recent revisions to federal rules to permit information technology donations to physicians will help spur I.T. adoption. Do you agree or disagree?
Shutt S; Tague RD; Jensen M; Forrest DL; Hartz C
Health Data Manag; 2007 Apr; 15(4):64. PubMed ID: 17500246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
